The change of judicial explanation for The Sherman Act shows the evolution of early antitrust decision in America, and the judicial process adapting to traditional democracy in industrial age.
《谢尔曼反托拉斯法》司法解释的变迁,体现了美国早期反托拉斯判决原则的演进和工业化美国适应传统民主的司法过程。
This strong tendency is shown in the constant change of its value and goal orientation in the anti-trust law.
美国是现代意义上的反垄断法的发源地,又是一个典型的信奉实用主义哲学的国家,在反托拉斯法领域的价值目标取向的不断变化体现出强烈的实用主义倾向。
While advancing the enormous development of economy,industrial associations often implement restrictive practices such as price-fixing,market pision,collective boycott,standardization activity and advertisement-limitation, all these practices constitute one type of restrictive agreements in nature and governed by anti-trust law.
美国反托拉斯法上主要适用本身违法规则、合理规则、快速审查规则进行分析。
Having developed for more than 100 years, America n anti-trust law, famous for its sternness, has formed a relatively perfect system, in which many important principles and systems have been set up through the cases of different periods.
以严厉而著称的美国反托拉斯法，经过一百多年的发展演变，已经形成了比较完备的体系，其中许多重要的原则和制度都是通过不同时期的判例确立的。
With the development of antitrust economics and US economy, US antitrust law has been changing greatly.
本文在介绍和评价这些新变化的基础上指出重视一贯的效率原则指向是美国反托拉斯法的重要特征,并且体现出由过去侧重静态效率向侧重制度效率和动态效率转变的特点。
America promulgated the earliest antitrust law - Sherman Act, and the judicial practices have also accumulated abundant cases law, whic.
通过比较研究的方法，借鉴反托拉斯法对限制竞争行为的规制，对于我国从反垄断角度和行业协会自身建设加强立法，具有重大意义。
The article use the Microsoft Case as a instance and use antitrust law of American as a brief introduction.
本文以微软案为契机,以美国反托拉斯法为中心,从法律和经济等多个角度对搭售行为进行了较为系统的研究。
From 1890 to1914, the federal government of the United States,made and carried out the antitrust policy,pushed by the people s antitrust campaign.
1890———1914年间,美国联邦政府在群众反托拉斯运动的推动下,制定并执行了反托拉斯政策。